12/25/2023 0 Comments Acm ar rails![]() ![]() « lessĪuthors: Schneider, K J Hostick, C J Ross, W A Peterson, R W Smith, R I Stiles, D L Daling, P M Weakley, S A Grinde, R B Young, J R Publication Date: Research Org.: USDOE Chicago Operations Office, Argonne, IL Pacific Northwest National Lab. Additional shielding is also effective in reducing doses to both radiation workers at the reactor and repository and to transport workers. The greatest annual dose reduction to the highest exposed individual workers (i.e., at the repository) is estimated to be achieved by using remote handling equipment more » for the cask handling operations at the repository. Major reductions in transportation system dose and cost are estimated to result from using higher-capacity rail and truck casks, and particularly when replacing legalweight truck casks with ''advanced design'' overweight truck casks. Most of the alternatives evaluated are estimated to provide both cost and dose reductions. st/.llective system dose for each alternative relative to the postulated reference transportation system are given. A total of 17 alternatives and subalternatives to the postulated reference transportation system are identified, conceptualized, and their dose-reduction potentials and costs estimated. Annual individual doses to the maximally exposed individuals or groups of individuals are also estimated. Collective doses are estimated for each of the major activities at the reactor site, in transit, and at the repository receiving facility. The report contains a detailed breakdown of activities and a description of time/distance/dose-rate estimates for each activity within the system. This report contains a system study of estimated radiation doses to the public and workers resulting from the transport of spent fuel from commercial nuclear power reactors to a geologic repository. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |